In Relations

a) THE SRENGHTSOF THE EMPLOYERS en causa ·         Ms. Keane was made aware of the concomitant that a lodge recording her poor punctuality and attendance had been started and she was ulterior reminded of the special(prenominal) that this file was being kept. She besides had complaints from parents approximately her teaching performance. ·         Ms Keanes lifestyle emergeside of work and the manner in which she became loadeding(a) go against the ethos of this entertain instruction. In the ASTI manual it states that, The Board talent be light upond to number in a way where a teachers performance and behaviour, over along period, has been consistently unsatis divisory, and/or undermines the ethos of the education. This is vital to the employers slip-up as it gives them the power to movement later on flushts that go against the ethos of the coach. ·         Management start out in any pillow slip further follo wed regulations as regards a follow up to this behaviour, every last(predicate) constructive wait on and advice should be give to the teacher, to serving him/her improve before either such final move should be contemplated. The employers can seize to shake up accomplish their role in this regard. The regional supervisor came and spoke with Ms. Keane and presented to her the options of acceptance or ending the kin as a doer to keeping her job. These options were rejected and she was then habituated the choice of sufferance or spark. The employers stated what the consequences of her swear outs would be and this was ignored, so strengthening the employers cause. ·         Ms Keane could non claim discrimination against her because of her pregnancy, as the problem first-year arose as a impart of the grammatical case of kin she was having and the pregnancy Merely confirmed the nature of the relationship. (Flynn v Power, 1985) Warnings had been administered previous to this confirmation o! f pregnancy. ·         Ms Keane must also wipe out been aware that her controversial private life could lead in complaints against her. As a teacher in a homespun catholic school set downting pregnant by a married man was not the best model to roach, where popular knowledge of her actions was likely to lead to people questioning her suitableness for her role as a teacher in this school THE WEAKNESSES OF THE EMPLOYERS CASE ·         Management did not follow the procedures set out in the ASTI manual as regards terminating a stable contract. She was brush off in mid term where as this should besides evanesce at the end of one and that(a) of the school terms. Ms Keane did not receive the required three months written notice. She should also score been given written notice from the principal of his/her use to give notice one month prior to the boundary of the contact. This did not occour. Also Ms Keane was only informed of the fact that she could magic spell to the bring forth capital of the Order after contacting the ASTI, where as she should have been made aware of this on dismissal (ASTI manual(a) 1996) These discrepancies on behalf of the employers weakens their case. ·         Ms. Keane was never issued with written warnings as regards her behaviour and her employers should have through with(p) this. They only issued verbal warnings. ·         The employers failed to follow procedures for a comme il faut dismissal, by not implementing each the Rules of Natural Justice prior to the dismissal. This split up looks un favourably on the employer. ·         The union seem to be richly behind Ms Keane and are pursuing the matter, which may be a source of concern to her employers, especi totallyy as if the case were to go to the exhaust, where if it ruled in Ms Keanes favour, the consequent would be legally binding. ·         The school also i gnored procedure, as Ms Keane was entitled to appear ! before the Board or be represented by the School Steward in rate to have her views aired before a close was even contemplated. This didnt occour and again reflects badly on the employer. b) OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE regional supervisory program ·         The supervisor is in a bad way(p) about the possible furtherance that could result from this case and she is also worried about the nemesis of industrial action. There is a conjecture of the case passing to the Rights Commissioner, which would mean no publicity as this uplifting is in private. This option may suit but if the outcome hear is admonishing and rejected the case must go to the EAT where the case is public and the outcome legally binding. ·         She could agree to have the opposition that was requested by the ASTI, but previously rejected, and reason the case and try to reach an agreement that would reduce publicity. The M early(a) Superior could also be brought into the discu ssions ·         Ms Keane could be offered a redundancy package in order to maintain the schools stopping foreshadow and also hold back further action on her behalf. or else Ms Keane could be offered a lump sum, but this efficacy only help her case as this could be seen as a bribe. In concurrence with the Unfair Dismissals Acts 1977- 1993 three different options available to solve the problem are ·         Reinstatement-Ms Keane could be given back her job with full compensation for loss of pay.

only when this option will only cause the same problems all over again. ·         Re-engagement-Ms Keane could be offe! red alternative work, but it could be for half-size pay and may not utilise her skills, as she would like, as she is a qualified teacher. ·         Financial Compensation-Ms Keane is entitled to a dogmatic of two years pay, but must show evidence of job seeking, and the payment is also reduced in accordance how much her conduct contributed to the dismissal. This may be a legal option to both parties. The Regional supervisory program is worried about the threat of industrial action and this is quite a let concern with this action is a definite possibility as a result of the non compliance of the employers with regulations as regards dismissal and their unwillingness to meet with the ASTI when requested. Therefore it would be advisable for the Regional Supervisor to end the situation and solve the problem in one of the ways outlined. c) EFFECT OF TREATY AND ACT ON THE CASE The Treaty of Amsterdam contains an article that allows the Council to take action i n regard to discrimination, based on sex, racial or heathenish origin, religion or belief, disability, age or intimate druthers. ·         Section 4.20 contains a declaration which has a semipolitical sort of than legal force which states that the Union will pry the placement of churches and philosophical and non-confessional organisations under the national law of their various(prenominal) component states. Here the national law of the country is the government factor in decisions about various rules or aspects of these organisations. So as Ms Keane went against the ethos of the school and they see it as effort for dismissal, the school will feel it is entitled to dismiss her. The mesh equation Act 1998 was established in relation to matters of discrimination. ·         In this act it states that discrimination by educational institutions run by spectral bodies are exempt from the usual legal procedures in this domain of a function whe n the institution takes action to prevent an employee! from undermining their ethos. Therefore under this act the schools actions are acceptable and cover by this exemption. These two legislative pieces combine to enhance the case of the school against Ms Keane as National Law in the Amsterdam Treaty and the undermining of the schools ethos with the Employment Equality Act favour their case. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper