A time to kill

In this painting criminal law is displayed. The Jury picking process was that at that place were numerous possible Jurors, and the dickens attorneys picked who got to be on the Jury during the trail, 6 filling for each(prenominal) lawyer. The lawyers based their designs on unimaginative stereotypes such as pureness will always odor that discolour is vile, and other factors that contributed to what each lawyer wanted.I feel as though this is reasonable In the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its non honorable that they are choosing people that they jockey what theyre final finding of fact will be. In todays community in that location Is contumaciously still much or less tension when It comes to race, and I feel as though those opinions and beliefs comes from the emeritus fashion ways of returning passed on from one generation to the next. This film does non change my opinion on the fact that I strongly believe the law should be upheld wh ether the person is black or white.I do believe that the white work force would draw been found immoral in that day, especially with a exculpation on paper, I do also believe that these men knew scarce what they were doing which makes their horror that much worsened ( Mess Rear), I also strongly believe that no proceeds the situation if the errors committed a crime as cruel as rape whether they were in the discipline sagaciousness or not should be put away.The term Cactus Reuse is basically saying guilty mind, and that a person must be turn up guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and with this flick the men were defiantly guilty, and with enough evidence and more to be put away for a long clock time, if not consequently for vitality. If I was Carl Lee I would aim done what he did and more.I dont think death is the worst thing that could decease to someone, I would feel as though them being tutored is beyond reassert and although some may present hat life in prison w ould be worse than terminal I do not chink. How is it exquisite that a person commits a crime that will alter their victims life for the worst, and effect them their whole life, and be aloud to suck live in a room, with a fundament and food and clothes on their back. I believe they died too soft for the crime they committed.In my opinion I solely agree with the verdict of not guilty for Carl Lee, I do not think that If he was in his right of mind( Mess Rear) or not that it would have made a deference, what he did was Justifiable and I agree with it, I also do not think that him lining guilty or not should have effected the Juries discussion, what he did he did because he needed too, and he should not feel guilty for killing the methamphetamine that raped his daughter.The title A fourth dimension to Kill related to the movie because In my opinion there Is a very small and apprehensible time to kill, such as when two men rape a 10 year old girl. That Is when there Is a time to kill. By Nick Starker a time to kill By nickels wanted. I feel as though this is honest in the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its not medium that they are choosing people that they know what theyre IANAL verdict will be. In todays society there is defiantly still some tension when it more.I dont think dying is the worst thing that could happen to someone, I would that if he was in his right of mind( Mess Rear) or not that it would have made a difference, what he did was Justifiable and I agree with it, I also do not think that him his daughter. The title A Time to Kill related to the movie because in my opinion there is a very small and comprehensible time to kill, such as when two men rape a 10 year old girl. That is when there is a time to kill.A time to killIn this movie criminal law is displayed. The Jury selection process was that there were many possible Jurors, and the two lawyers picked who got to be on the Jury during the trail, 6 choice for each lawyer. The lawyers based their designs on stereotypical stereotypes such as white will always feel that black is guilty, and other factors that contributed to what each lawyer wanted.I feel as though this is fair In the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its not fair that they are choosing people that they know what theyre final verdict will be. In todays society there Is defiantly still some tension when It comes to race, and I feel as though those opinions and beliefs comes from the old fashion ways of thinking passed on from one generation to the next. This movie does not change my opinion on the fact that I strongly believe the law should be upheld whether the person is black or white.I do believe that the white men would have been found guilty in that day, especially with a confession on paper, I do also believe that these men knew exactly what they were doing which makes their crime that much worse ( Mess Rear), I also strongly believe that no matter the situa tion if the errors committed a crime as cruel as rape whether they were in the right mind or not should be put away.The term Cactus Reuse is basically saying guilty mind, and that a person must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and with this movie the men were defiantly guilty, and with enough evidence and more to be put away for a long time, if not then for life. If I was Carl Lee I would have done what he did and more.I dont think dying is the worst thing that could happen to someone, I would feel as though them being tutored is beyond Justified and although some may argue hat life in prison would be worse than death I do not agree. How is it fair that a person commits a crime that will alter their victims life for the worst, and effect them their whole life, and be aloud to have live in a room, with a bed and food and clothes on their back. I believe they died too easily for the crime they committed.In my opinion I completely agree with the verdict of not guilty for Car l Lee, I do not think that If he was in his right of mind( Mess Rear) or not that it would have made a deference, what he did was Justifiable and I agree with it, I also do not think that him lining guilty or not should have effected the Juries discussion, what he did he did because he needed too, and he should not feel guilty for killing the scum that raped his daughter.The title A Time to Kill related to the movie because In my opinion there Is a very small and understandable time to kill, such as when two men rape a 10 year old girl. That Is when there Is a time to kill. By Nick Starker a time to kill By nickels wanted. I feel as though this is fair in the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its not fair that they are choosing people that they know what theyre IANAL verdict will be. In todays society there is defiantly still some tension when it more.I dont think dying is the worst thing that could happen to someone, I would that if he was in his right of mind( Me ss Rear) or not that it would have made a difference, what he did was Justifiable and I agree with it, I also do not think that him his daughter. The title A Time to Kill related to the movie because in my opinion there is a very small and understandable time to kill, such as when two men rape a 10 year old girl. That is when there is a time to kill.